56
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 415:
Line 415: + + + +
no edit summary
:One by one these intelligent, articulate, and cautious people walk away after being scolded and reverted for trying to help; so much wasted goodwill! [[User:CrystalFlower]], [[User:User6789]] [[User:Tom Haws|Tom Haws]] ([[User talk:Tom Haws|talk]]) 03:30, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
:One by one these intelligent, articulate, and cautious people walk away after being scolded and reverted for trying to help; so much wasted goodwill! [[User:CrystalFlower]], [[User:User6789]] [[User:Tom Haws|Tom Haws]] ([[User talk:Tom Haws|talk]]) 03:30, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
:: Thanks, I should have read the whole page before joining. While I appreciated Margotbean's effort and wasn't going to say anything, I feel I should after reading more (here, user talk & contribs, plus page histories & talk pages at [[special:AllPages]] using namespace drop-down). For every 1 person calling out bad treatment, vastly more will just leave angry. I agree power is leveraged unfairly. I got approval before tasks, felt encouraged and was immediately reversed, citing new edits "didn’t match" the non-updated pages (yep of course, because those were acknowledged by admin prior as needing updates, no update visible in history for cited page, not possible to do all pages at once). Social whiplash results leaving a horrid taste; hard not to wonder if intended. I read answers to helpful, knowledgeable editors which seem intended to provoke, successfully. Also in agreement the wiki ''appears like'' a community project (maybe for the benefit of CA?), though edits are discouraged except for well-connected community people.
:: Lots of similar social whiplash-like things read. Initial words suggest respect, subsequent actions belie it ('''I'd be doing a disservice to new contributors if not truthful'''). I must infer there's no one else to do admin duties, or perhaps the behavior is approved given it is hosted and controlled by the developer. The ones speaking out seem knowledgeable of wikis (saw where one guy who created advanced templates relied on, was prevented from improving and suggested improvements also denied after current admin was elevated post-migration from Chucklefish). Connected maybe, as unappealing as that sounds? Maybe CA will one day read and address the issue, since it is becoming a PR and perhaps a sales problem, but probably not. I'd guess these comments will get archived and new contributors won't see them. I won't be buying future games having to rely on "community" resources run this way, sorry CA. [[User:User6789|User6789]] ([[User talk:User6789|talk]]) 08:37, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
== Uploaded Wrong File ==
== Uploaded Wrong File ==