::Well thanks for the explanation and that's a fair point. I just found it a bit weird that stores constitute a subcategory in the buildings subcategory (each store being also in each regional location subcategory), but the other buildings are not in the buildings category at all. But that's probably my Aristotelian tendency to look towards formally coherent logical inclusions that may not be highly vital here... | ::Well thanks for the explanation and that's a fair point. I just found it a bit weird that stores constitute a subcategory in the buildings subcategory (each store being also in each regional location subcategory), but the other buildings are not in the buildings category at all. But that's probably my Aristotelian tendency to look towards formally coherent logical inclusions that may not be highly vital here... |