Changes

:::Didn't know "user space" was a thing! I've dumped my draft onto [[User:IBugOne/Item Quality]] so you can take a look. Thanks! - [[User:IBugOne|IBugOne]] ([[User talk:IBugOne|talk]]) 19:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

:::Didn't know "user space" was a thing! I've dumped my draft onto [[User:IBugOne/Item Quality]] so you can take a look. Thanks! - [[User:IBugOne|IBugOne]] ([[User talk:IBugOne|talk]]) 19:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

::::It's a nice looking page, but my objective honest feedback is that there's not enough unique info to justify a separate page. [[User:Margotbean|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean|talk]]) 18:31, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

::::It's a nice looking page, but my objective honest feedback is that there's not enough unique info to justify a separate page. [[User:Margotbean|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean|talk]]) 18:31, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

:::::I never imagined it could have too much unique info. As I opened with, it ''Serves as a good entry page'', and is a perfect resource for those who wonder "What items can have star qualities?" or "What does the star on the item do?" IMO, these questions lack a good answer about quality in general, notably "What's the formulae for quality bonus?" Considering that with only 4 items, [[Bait]] justifies as a page, this game mechanism surely does, too. - [[User:IBugOne|IBugOne]] ([[User talk:IBugOne|talk]]) 19:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

:::::I never imagined it could have too much unique info. As I opened with, it ''Serves as a good entry page'', and is a perfect resource for those who wonder "What items can have star qualities?" or "What does the star on the item do?" IMO, these questions lack a good answer about quality in general, notably "What's the formulae for quality bonus?" Considering that even with only 4 items, [[Bait]] still justifies as a page. So does this game mechanism, for sure. - [[User:IBugOne|IBugOne]] ([[User talk:IBugOne|talk]]) 19:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

:As per my rationale above, the draft page should now do well on what it's supposed to. It compiles most (if not all) commonalities of the quality star into one page, and links to other pages should a reader wants to learn more about specific categories. The only missing part would be a ''History'' section that's common to all pages. Shouldn't be hard to add one but I doubt the necessity, just like [[Getting Started]] doesn't need one, either.

:As per my rationale above, the draft page should now do well on what it's supposed to. It compiles most (if not all) commonalities of the quality star into one page, and links to other pages should a reader wants to learn more about specific categories. The only missing part would be a ''History'' section that's common to all pages. Shouldn't be hard to add one but I doubt the necessity, just like [[Getting Started]] doesn't need one, either.