Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 89: Line 89:  
This is going to confuse people. I see that you obtained the latest notes from a decompile. I think it would be best if the Wiki only contained the official patch notes from ConcernedApe. What's your opinion?<br />—<small>[[User:MrJunimo|MrJunimo]] ([[User talk:MrJunimo|talk]]) 12:27, 11 January 2023‎ (UTC)</small>
 
This is going to confuse people. I see that you obtained the latest notes from a decompile. I think it would be best if the Wiki only contained the official patch notes from ConcernedApe. What's your opinion?<br />—<small>[[User:MrJunimo|MrJunimo]] ([[User talk:MrJunimo|talk]]) 12:27, 11 January 2023‎ (UTC)</small>
   −
: Hi! That forum post shows release notes for 1.5.6.32/33/35, and silently skips 1.5.6.34. It's not unusual for an update to have missing or incomplete release notes, which is one of the reason the wiki isn't just a copy & paste of the official notes. It does link to the announcement (when there is one) so you can see the original release notes (if any) though. I'll be posting the release notes for 1.5.6.35 later today if nobody else does it first, which should reduce confusion. —<small>[[User:Pathoschild|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild|talk]]) 17:41, 11 January 2023 (UTC)</small>
+
: Hi! That forum post shows release notes for 1.5.6.32/33/35, and silently skips 1.5.6.34. It's not unusual for an update to have missing or incomplete release notes, which is one of the reason the wiki isn't just a copy & paste of the official notes. It does link to the announcement (when there is one) so you can see the original release notes (if any). I added 1.5.6.35 to the wiki and asked Magically Clueless to add version numbers to her post though, which should both reduce confusion. Thanks for pointing it out! —<small>[[User:Pathoschild|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild|talk]]) 17:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC)</small>
translators
8,439

edits

Navigation menu