Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
872 bytes added ,  04:23, 9 November 2022
Line 8: Line 8:  
:Having said that, there are inconsistencies across pages on the wiki, and I appreciate your desire and efforts to rectify those. The Bundles page says the Walleye can be found in "Lakes" -- this should say "the Mountain Lake", as it's the only lake in the game (the "lake" in Cindersap Forest is a pond, not a lake). That's an easy problem to fix. As for the rest, we need more testing before making changes.  [[User:Margotbean|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean|talk]]) 03:52, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 
:Having said that, there are inconsistencies across pages on the wiki, and I appreciate your desire and efforts to rectify those. The Bundles page says the Walleye can be found in "Lakes" -- this should say "the Mountain Lake", as it's the only lake in the game (the "lake" in Cindersap Forest is a pond, not a lake). That's an easy problem to fix. As for the rest, we need more testing before making changes.  [[User:Margotbean|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean|talk]]) 03:52, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 
::Typo, meant Cindersap Forest when referring to the Pond/River. I didn't specify it here but I've specified it in multiple locations. I'm cross referencing Data\Locations, Data\Fish, and Farm::getFish. Hill-Top Farm setting 0 is referring to Data\Locations which specifies a 0 for River in Cindersap Forest, which Hill-Top pulls its pool from (https://stardewvalleywiki.com/Modding:Fish_data#Spawn_locations)and etc etc I'm saying the same thign you've said the same, but I guess I shoot back to "if we can't trust the code, what can we trust". In the meantime, I posit a question: Should we leave misleading or incorrect information if the code says otherwise when compared to the wiki, without testing? Or should we make an edit with code-"correct" information with/without a reference or note? I just want to make sure I'm marking the correct locations to come back to, or if I need to "ignore" it until there's proof. [[User:Spiderkace|Spiderkace]] ([[User talk:Spiderkace|talk]]) 04:08, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 
::Typo, meant Cindersap Forest when referring to the Pond/River. I didn't specify it here but I've specified it in multiple locations. I'm cross referencing Data\Locations, Data\Fish, and Farm::getFish. Hill-Top Farm setting 0 is referring to Data\Locations which specifies a 0 for River in Cindersap Forest, which Hill-Top pulls its pool from (https://stardewvalleywiki.com/Modding:Fish_data#Spawn_locations)and etc etc I'm saying the same thign you've said the same, but I guess I shoot back to "if we can't trust the code, what can we trust". In the meantime, I posit a question: Should we leave misleading or incorrect information if the code says otherwise when compared to the wiki, without testing? Or should we make an edit with code-"correct" information with/without a reference or note? I just want to make sure I'm marking the correct locations to come back to, or if I need to "ignore" it until there's proof. [[User:Spiderkace|Spiderkace]] ([[User talk:Spiderkace|talk]]) 04:08, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 +
:::We both want the same thing: an accurate wiki. My only issue is that you've made multiple changes, and then went back and edited them to remove the 4-Corners farm, in the same day. So, slow down!
 +
:::And, no, you can't always trust the code unless you step through it. However, in this case, I think creating a farm and doing some fishing would enough to verify the changes you want to make that are based on the static code from ILSpy. So, mark the spots where you see things that look wrong, make sure you're reasonably correct about your changes (by doing some fishing on a non-standard farm map), and then make the changes. If you wait for proof from someone else, you'll be waiting a long time, as my "to do" list stretches back to v1.3 in some cases. ok? Good? Thank you, [[User:Margotbean|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean|talk]]) 04:23, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
107,526

edits

Navigation menu