649
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 48:
Line 48: + + + + + + + +
→Points: new section
:Only 1 book gives cooking recipes, get rid of it and make the paragraph more generic. [[User:Margotbean|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean|talk]]) 18:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
:Only 1 book gives cooking recipes, get rid of it and make the paragraph more generic. [[User:Margotbean|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean|talk]]) 18:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
:Ah, Giles, you've added info whilst I was replying. My previous reply addresses point 1, I agree with point 2. I was thinking the same thing. [[User:Margotbean|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean|talk]]) 19:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
:Ah, Giles, you've added info whilst I was replying. My previous reply addresses point 1, I agree with point 2. I was thinking the same thing. [[User:Margotbean|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean|talk]]) 19:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
== Points ==
Since it now appears that all books can give points, I find that the info about it is inappropriately distributed around the article. Especially so, since points are not just of one kind. So:
1) Should I now take it that a re-reading of the Queen of Sauce cookbook produces points as with other books (non-specific skill)?
2) I'll make an edit to haul the general points issues up to the article lead, paragraph 1. That will leave specifics to be mentioned in their relevant places without undue repetition and complication. All in the interest of brevity and clarity everywhere. But that will cause any existing exception to Queen of Sauce to disappear. Need to know if it needs a special mention. I'm unable to check that out right now. [[User:Giles|Giles]] ([[User talk:Giles|talk]]) 20:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)