Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Text replacement - "tt>" to "samp>"
Line 543: Line 543:  
});
 
});
 
</syntaxhighlight>
 
</syntaxhighlight>
(You can try the snippet by adding it to [[Special:MyPage/common.js|your <tt>common.js</tt> subpage]].) —<small>[[User:Pathoschild|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild|talk]]) 17:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)</small>
+
(You can try the snippet by adding it to [[Special:MyPage/common.js|your <samp>common.js</samp> subpage]].) —<small>[[User:Pathoschild|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild|talk]]) 17:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)</small>
 
:+1 for adding this (to all languages)  [[User:Margotbean|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean|talk]]) 21:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 
:+1 for adding this (to all languages)  [[User:Margotbean|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean|talk]]) 21:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 
:: I've added this for all languages - thanks!! [[User:Katzeus|Katzeus]] ([[User talk:Katzeus|talk]]) 13:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 
:: I've added this for all languages - thanks!! [[User:Katzeus|Katzeus]] ([[User talk:Katzeus|talk]]) 13:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Line 599: Line 599:     
== Syntax highlighting is broken ==
 
== Syntax highlighting is broken ==
Recently the <tt>&lt;source&gt;</tt> tag no longer recognises any language (including <tt>c#</tt> and <tt>javascript</tt>), and pages using the tag are listed in [[:Category:Pages with syntax highlighting errors]]. Is it possible the extension wasn't installed correctly on the new server? —<small>[[User:Pathoschild|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild|talk]]) 19:31, 11 July 2019 (UTC)</small>
+
Recently the <samp>&lt;source&gt;</samp> tag no longer recognises any language (including <samp>c#</samp> and <samp>javascript</samp>), and pages using the tag are listed in [[:Category:Pages with syntax highlighting errors]]. Is it possible the extension wasn't installed correctly on the new server? —<small>[[User:Pathoschild|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild|talk]]) 19:31, 11 July 2019 (UTC)</small>
 
:Thanks for the report - this should be resolved now! -- [[User:Katzeus|Katzeus]] ([[User talk:Katzeus|talk]]) 10:03, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 
:Thanks for the report - this should be resolved now! -- [[User:Katzeus|Katzeus]] ([[User talk:Katzeus|talk]]) 10:03, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
   Line 732: Line 732:  
Anyone can show a list of changes to an article or talk page going back to the start: choose a list size, time interval, and proceed earlier or later at will. Not so with "recent changes". Yes, I understand "recent". But I've returned after a necessary absence of 3 weeks and can't get back very far in what must be a long list. In fact, in the past, I have been unable to see all the changes that occurred in the prior 12-18 hours or so, even showing the complete 500 changes allowed. So "recent" may require some interpretation, but the limit of 500 is absolute and, I would argue, too small. Is there some reason we cannot look further back? I find it hard to believe that there is no need at all (I have needed to), and I also find it hard to believe that there are so many occasions to want to look far back that it would introduce lookup problems or inefficiencies for the Wiki. Can the article look-back feature be turned on for recents? [[User:Butterbur|Butterbur]] ([[User talk:Butterbur|talk]]) 20:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 
Anyone can show a list of changes to an article or talk page going back to the start: choose a list size, time interval, and proceed earlier or later at will. Not so with "recent changes". Yes, I understand "recent". But I've returned after a necessary absence of 3 weeks and can't get back very far in what must be a long list. In fact, in the past, I have been unable to see all the changes that occurred in the prior 12-18 hours or so, even showing the complete 500 changes allowed. So "recent" may require some interpretation, but the limit of 500 is absolute and, I would argue, too small. Is there some reason we cannot look further back? I find it hard to believe that there is no need at all (I have needed to), and I also find it hard to believe that there are so many occasions to want to look far back that it would introduce lookup problems or inefficiencies for the Wiki. Can the article look-back feature be turned on for recents? [[User:Butterbur|Butterbur]] ([[User talk:Butterbur|talk]]) 20:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
   −
: The actual limit is much higher than shown in the UI. Click 500, then change <tt>&limit=500</tt> in the URL to a higher number to see more. —<small>[[User:Pathoschild|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild|talk]]) 03:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)</small>
+
: The actual limit is much higher than shown in the UI. Click 500, then change <samp>&limit=500</samp> in the URL to a higher number to see more. —<small>[[User:Pathoschild|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild|talk]]) 03:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)</small>
    
::Aha! Never noticed that in the URL before. The default one doesn't have it. Thanks! Browsing is like foraging, I guess. ;) [[User:Butterbur|Butterbur]] ([[User talk:Butterbur|talk]]) 06:28, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 
::Aha! Never noticed that in the URL before. The default one doesn't have it. Thanks! Browsing is like foraging, I guess. ;) [[User:Butterbur|Butterbur]] ([[User talk:Butterbur|talk]]) 06:28, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
105,955

edits

Navigation menu