Difference between revisions of "Talk:Deluxe Fertilizer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created blank page) |
(talkheader, signature, reply) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Talkheader}} | ||
| + | == Miscalculations? == | ||
| + | Someone realized the table adds up to 101% in these following rows. | ||
| + | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| + | ! Farming level !! % Regular quality !! Silver quality !! Gold quality !! Iridium Quality !! Average price | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 2 || 0% || 66% || 22% || 13% || 1.40 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 6 || 0% || 35% || 39% || 27% || 1.55 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 8 || 0% || 22% || 45% || 34% || 1.61 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 14 || 0% || 0% || 46% || 55% || 1.77 | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | Rest of the rows is at 100% [[User:ZLGaming|ZLGaming]] ([[User talk:ZLGaming|talk]]) 05:32, 9 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
| + | : That's just the result of rounding. E.g. if for Farming level 2 you have 65.6% Silver, 21.7% Gold and 12.7% Iridium it adds up to exactly 100, but rounding it mathematically correctly to full numbers yields 66, 22, 13; resulting in 101. I didn't redo the math for this function, but a chance table adding up to ''101'' is common, and not necessarily mathematically incorrect. [[User:Dubesor|Dubesor]] ([[User talk:Dubesor|talk]]) 15:40, 9 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:41, 9 May 2022
| This talk page is for discussing Deluxe Fertilizer. | |
|---|---|
|
|
Miscalculations?
Someone realized the table adds up to 101% in these following rows.
| Farming level | % Regular quality | Silver quality | Gold quality | Iridium Quality | Average price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0% | 66% | 22% | 13% | 1.40 |
| 6 | 0% | 35% | 39% | 27% | 1.55 |
| 8 | 0% | 22% | 45% | 34% | 1.61 |
| 14 | 0% | 0% | 46% | 55% | 1.77 |
Rest of the rows is at 100% ZLGaming (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- That's just the result of rounding. E.g. if for Farming level 2 you have 65.6% Silver, 21.7% Gold and 12.7% Iridium it adds up to exactly 100, but rounding it mathematically correctly to full numbers yields 66, 22, 13; resulting in 101. I didn't redo the math for this function, but a chance table adding up to 101 is common, and not necessarily mathematically incorrect. Dubesor (talk) 15:40, 9 May 2022 (UTC)