Difference between revisions of "Talk:Greenhouse"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JaksStrange (talk | contribs) |
JaksStrange (talk | contribs) m (→Optimal Trellis Layout: typo) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Well, let's not worry about what other blogs or wikis say. If you can clean up the image by removing any English text, and getting rid of the green semi-transparent bars, then we might have something. If you can show that the arrangement is optimal, instead of saying "there's probably something better", then we would definitely have something we could add to the page. For now, I'm going to delete the existing images. [[User:Margotbean|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean|talk]]) 19:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC) | :Well, let's not worry about what other blogs or wikis say. If you can clean up the image by removing any English text, and getting rid of the green semi-transparent bars, then we might have something. If you can show that the arrangement is optimal, instead of saying "there's probably something better", then we would definitely have something we could add to the page. For now, I'm going to delete the existing images. [[User:Margotbean|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean|talk]]) 19:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
::Not sure what the problem here is. I never intended for those images to be added to the page; I just provided them to demonstrate my findings because trying to describe them in text would be ridiculously unhelpful for others to compare to. I left the sprinkler coverage highlights because it made it easier to see that the weird arrangement does in fact cover all the Hops and made it clear there were some uncovered tiles. And I only mentioned the blog to show what my research on the matter had turned up. I was only trying to start a discussion about the problem to be solved and say it would be a valuable addition to the page. I don't know how you expect other people to compare their own arrangements without being able to see what someone else found. If the inline display is considered bad form for that, fine, I don't have to leave it there, but is a link really causing any harm here? How else can I communicate the best I've found so far for someone with more knowledge about the problem to consider or compare to? This is a ''discussion'' page, right? [[User:Bladeoflight16|Bladeoflight16]] ([[User talk:Bladeoflight16|talk]]) 00:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC) | ::Not sure what the problem here is. I never intended for those images to be added to the page; I just provided them to demonstrate my findings because trying to describe them in text would be ridiculously unhelpful for others to compare to. I left the sprinkler coverage highlights because it made it easier to see that the weird arrangement does in fact cover all the Hops and made it clear there were some uncovered tiles. And I only mentioned the blog to show what my research on the matter had turned up. I was only trying to start a discussion about the problem to be solved and say it would be a valuable addition to the page. I don't know how you expect other people to compare their own arrangements without being able to see what someone else found. If the inline display is considered bad form for that, fine, I don't have to leave it there, but is a link really causing any harm here? How else can I communicate the best I've found so far for someone with more knowledge about the problem to consider or compare to? This is a ''discussion'' page, right? [[User:Bladeoflight16|Bladeoflight16]] ([[User talk:Bladeoflight16|talk]]) 00:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::Margot already said that if you can "clean up" the image, it can be added to the page. It has not been said that it will be impossible add this content, also just make sure it’s the best layout. [[User:JaksStrange|JaksStrange]] ([[User talk:JaksStrange|talk]]) 01:33, 14 May 2021 (UTC) | + | :::Margot already said that if you can "clean up" the image, it can be added to the page. It has not been said that it will be impossible to add this content, also just make sure it’s the best layout. [[User:JaksStrange|JaksStrange]] ([[User talk:JaksStrange|talk]]) 01:33, 14 May 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:35, 14 May 2021
| This talk page is for discussing Greenhouse. | |
|---|---|
|
|
Optimal Trellis Layout
Because Hops are a contender for most profitable crop, it would be useful to include an optimal trellis layout. I found an arrangement that allows for 90:
image removed by admin
There's probably something better, though. The so called "optimal" arrangement suggested on a blog (that the site will not allow me to link to) is only 86. Bladeoflight16 (talk) 19:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Well, let's not worry about what other blogs or wikis say. If you can clean up the image by removing any English text, and getting rid of the green semi-transparent bars, then we might have something. If you can show that the arrangement is optimal, instead of saying "there's probably something better", then we would definitely have something we could add to the page. For now, I'm going to delete the existing images. margotbean (talk) 19:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Not sure what the problem here is. I never intended for those images to be added to the page; I just provided them to demonstrate my findings because trying to describe them in text would be ridiculously unhelpful for others to compare to. I left the sprinkler coverage highlights because it made it easier to see that the weird arrangement does in fact cover all the Hops and made it clear there were some uncovered tiles. And I only mentioned the blog to show what my research on the matter had turned up. I was only trying to start a discussion about the problem to be solved and say it would be a valuable addition to the page. I don't know how you expect other people to compare their own arrangements without being able to see what someone else found. If the inline display is considered bad form for that, fine, I don't have to leave it there, but is a link really causing any harm here? How else can I communicate the best I've found so far for someone with more knowledge about the problem to consider or compare to? This is a discussion page, right? Bladeoflight16 (talk) 00:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Margot already said that if you can "clean up" the image, it can be added to the page. It has not been said that it will be impossible to add this content, also just make sure it’s the best layout. JaksStrange (talk) 01:33, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Not sure what the problem here is. I never intended for those images to be added to the page; I just provided them to demonstrate my findings because trying to describe them in text would be ridiculously unhelpful for others to compare to. I left the sprinkler coverage highlights because it made it easier to see that the weird arrangement does in fact cover all the Hops and made it clear there were some uncovered tiles. And I only mentioned the blog to show what my research on the matter had turned up. I was only trying to start a discussion about the problem to be solved and say it would be a valuable addition to the page. I don't know how you expect other people to compare their own arrangements without being able to see what someone else found. If the inline display is considered bad form for that, fine, I don't have to leave it there, but is a link really causing any harm here? How else can I communicate the best I've found so far for someone with more knowledge about the problem to consider or compare to? This is a discussion page, right? Bladeoflight16 (talk) 00:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC)