107,325
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + + +
→Standardize hotfix format in version history
I want to standardize how they're handled, but I'm not sure what's the best format to use. What do you think of one section per version number, with hotfixes listed at the bottom ([https://i.imgur.com/wZSTFTX.png see mockup])? —<small>[[User:Pathoschild|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild|talk]]) 23:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)</small>
I want to standardize how they're handled, but I'm not sure what's the best format to use. What do you think of one section per version number, with hotfixes listed at the bottom ([https://i.imgur.com/wZSTFTX.png see mockup])? —<small>[[User:Pathoschild|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild|talk]]) 23:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)</small>
:Definitely the mockup! I dislike seeing "hotfix" in the headers and TOC in such a big font like v1.5.5; I do like v1.5.3, but if the little "1" or asterisk (or whatever marker we use to denote the hotfix) is accidentally deleted, then we may be searching page history for hours to reconcile it -- it's too fragile a system. I don't like losing info (like v1.5.1) at all.
:The only thing I somewhat don't like about the mockup is that it violates the "newest version at the top" rule... but the hotfixes are unversioned, and the format makes sense within the version section.
:So, there you have it, my vote is for the mockup 100%. :) [[User:Margotbean|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean|talk]]) 14:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)